Granna Bytes: Public Law Election Update

Anna von Reitz

Article (blog edition)

Anna’s wording and the source notices are reproduced in full below. The views expressed are the author’s.

Original article ↗ · Paul Stramer’s blog ↗

Reading overview

TASA summary of Anna’s article

Anna reports progress on Assembly voting for proposed Public Laws and explains the work still needed to bring the text, amendments and enabling actions to final approval. At the time of writing, she hopes to complete that process by Christmas. She also asks General Assemblies to consider supporting Federation-level courts. The update gives readers a picture of the next decisions and practical steps within the Assembly programme she describes.

Key points

Initial balloting is followed by approval of the final text and adoption arrangements.
Anna's stated aim is completion by Christmas, subject to the remaining process.
She proposes further Assembly consideration of Federation-level courts.

Prepared by TASA from the research, conclusions and reflections Anna presents in her article. Her original wording follows below.

Read Anna’s original article ↓

Anna’s original article

By Anna Von Reitz

The initial balloting shows broad spectrum support for the new proposed Public Laws. Final balloting will include the enabling clause and action, the edits and additions brought forward by the Assemblies in process, and final approval for each new Public Law.

None of the Amendments were anything substantially changing the initial ballot measures or anything controversial, so we expect the final enrollment process to pass and for these new Public Laws to be in effect by Christmas.

I look at this as the best Christmas present ever.

Along with the Public Law Final Ballot and Adoption/Enrollment Action for each new Public Law, we will be asking each General Assembly to vote their support for the establishment of a new Federation-level Court to fill the gap left when the Federal Republic ceased to function and the Article III courts that the Federal Republic was supposed to provide became unavailable.

This lack has meant that millions of Americans have had nowhere to go to effectively sue the Federal Government corporations and their franchise operations at the State and County levels.

The only Federal Court left operating in this specific venue and sea jurisdiction was the Federal Claims Court that was set up by the British Territorial "United States" to hear claims brought by Native tribes and territorial persons.

As our Federation of States was the direct delegator of all delegated powers, including the right and responsibility to operate what has been termed "Article III courts", the right and responsibility to provide these courts rolls back to the Federation by Operation of Law.

We don't really need specific direct approval by the States to establish these Federation Courts, but we would like each General Assembly to be made aware of these issues and actions and encourage their support, as part of a necessary effort to restore our court system.

Just as international land jurisdiction law enforcement was vacated when the Federal Marshals program was defunded, the jurisdiction of the Article III courts was made unavailable, too. The opening of Federation Courts to replace the lost function of the Article III Courts will work in tandem with the Continental Marshals Service.

Granna

------------------

See this article and over 6000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations? Find out here.

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the authors, and a link back to this website at http://www.annavonreitz.com, or post the title of the article and a snippet with a link to the article on our website. This copyright is held by Anna Von Reitz, and Paul Stramer jointly. ©2015-2026 All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©

Anna von Reitz’s original archive ↗

TASA summary of Anna’s article

Key points

Anna’s original article

Stay connected with TASA

Newsletter subscription privacy agreement