International Public Notice: The Brunson Case

Anna von Reitz

Article (blog edition)

Anna’s wording and the source notices are reproduced in full below. The views expressed are the author’s.

Original article ↗ · Paul Stramer’s blog ↗

Reading overview

TASA summary of Anna’s article

Anna uses discussion of the Brunson cases to examine elections, representation and public accountability. She leaves the reported Supreme Court outcome open, explicitly treating it as uncertain. Her broader conclusion is that meaningful self-government requires informed participation and a clear understanding of who is being represented. She contrasts federal party and Electoral College processes with the State Assembly elections she supports, and calls for truthful disclosure and military accountability to civilian government.

Key points

Anna treats the reported court outcome as uncertain.
She distinguishes federal electoral processes from the Assembly participation she advocates.
Her wider emphasis is on informed representation, transparency and civilian accountability.

Prepared by TASA from the research, conclusions and reflections Anna presents in her article. Her original wording follows below.

Read Anna’s original article ↓

Anna’s original article

By Anna Von Reitz

We absolutely DO believe that the 2020 Elections hosted by the political parties in this country were rigged and that foreign players, mainly foreign intelligence agents and Chinese hackers, were responsible.

That conclusion is obvious on the face of it and has been, since the first investigation findings leaked out of Italy and the Zionist-Fabian CIA cell in Frankfurt, Germany.

Rumors are now circulating that "the Brunson Case" touching on this subject — there are actually multiple "Brunson cases"— was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and was upheld (agreeing that there was sufficient evidence to overturn the 2020 election), but that a "National Security" interest was asserted by the military and that they blocked release of the Court findings and put several of the Justices under personal custody and gag ordered everyone, fearing civil unrest.

They, the military, would decide when and how the news would be released to the American Public, but the American Public, at least anyone who cares, already knows. We didn't need the U.S. Supreme Court to tell us then or now.

What we do need is for the military to do its job and then stand down and give control back to the civilian government of this country — by which we mean the American Government staffed by Americans, not more Federal Bureaucrats who are adopting foreign "personhood" and who are supposed to be residing in the District of Columbia.

We aren't going to get excited about the results of "the Brunson case" — if there are results.

What would get us excited in a positive way, would be if the Armed Forces told the truth.

Start with the fact that there haven't been free public elections in this country since the Constitutional "Framework" was adopted.

The Electoral College system made sure of that, and later the introduction of political parties from Europe made sure that the rank and file would be deceived and distracted and convinced that their votes counted.

But no. Their votes don't count and they never have. That is why polling place security is a joke. That's why cyber security on the voting machines is a joke, too.

Why doesn't "the military" man up and tell the American Public the Truth? If they can find it with both hands after being taken over by the IDF?

In our opinion, the people in charge of all these "military" (but actually mercenary) forces are too cowardly and politically correct to be found at the helm when the SHTF.

That won't keep the kaka from hitting. It just means that the Armed Forces will be twirling their curls and sitting on their thumbs when it does.

Here is the news, boys and girls. The last free public election at the Federal level took place in 1784. George Washington was the only candidate.

The actual State Assemblies hold public elections among the State Nationals and State Citizens, and that is where the idea of "free public elections" begins and ends.

Tell the American Public. Maybe more people would get off their tuffets and participate in the ONLY elections where their votes count.

The Federal Subcontractors lodged in Washington DC never held truly public elections of any kind at all. Ever. The Electoral College elects all their officers. Including their Presidents.

Meanwhile, back on the farm....

The political parties select the candidates and put them through a political straw poll "election" for purported "shareholders"— and that whole multi-billion dollar process and waste of time doesn't actually elect anyone.

THAT is the "election" that was interfered with, and so far as we know there is no law against tampering with straw poll elections held by private foreign corporations in the business of providing essential government services.

Maybe they can claim "False Advertising" but who would they claim it against, when they are all up to their chins in bilking and misleading the American Public about elections?

We understand why Trump is upset with the 2020 election fraud, but that isn't the real story so far as Americans are concerned.

The real story is that we've been defrauded and deluded about practically everything concerning "our" government and that includes but is not limited to elections.

Issued by:

Anna Maria Riezinger -Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

October 12th 2026

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the authors, and a link back to this website at http://www.annavonreitz.com, or post the title of the article and a snippet with a link to the article on our website. This copyright is held by Anna Von Reitz, and Paul Stramer jointly. ©2015-2026 All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©

Anna von Reitz’s original archive ↗

TASA summary of Anna’s article

Key points

Anna’s original article

Stay connected with TASA

Newsletter subscription privacy agreement