Anna von Reitz
Article (blog edition)
Anna’s wording and the source notices are reproduced in full below. The views expressed are the author’s.
Reading overview
TASA summary of Anna’s article
Anna examines proposed changes in taxation and banking through a question of principle: what authority or control accompanies a promised financial benefit? She raises concerns about the QFS arrangements described in the article and concludes that ending an unwanted practice is only part of the work of repair. Her notice calls for accountability and restitution for past losses, as well as clarity about the institutions involved. The emphasis is on evaluating the full terms and consequences of reform.
Key points
- Anna asks what conditions and restrictions accompany proposed banking changes.
- She distinguishes ending a practice from repairing its past consequences.
- Her conclusion calls for transparency, accountability and restitution.
Prepared by TASA from the research, conclusions and reflections Anna presents in her article. Her original wording follows below.
Read Anna’s original article ↓Anna’s original article
By Anna Von Reitz
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents
On the fourth of September, Donald Trump signed two Executive Orders addressed to his officers and subcontractors, ending the Internal Revenue Service. Quote DOJ: "Forever barred and precluded from examining or prosecuting...."
That sounds like good news to millions of Americans who should never have been addressed by either the Internal Revenue Service or the Municipal IRS, either one. There might even be dancing in the streets. However, removal of a scourge that should never have been applied to us or our public employees, either one, is only part of the story --- and the smaller part, too.
A more efficient and in its own way, more horrific, means of control and collection has been devised -- a cradle to grave banking monopoly built on the Chinese "meritocracy" system, in which everyone has to toe the Party Line or loose access to banking services. It is not coincidental that the IRS is being phased out just as the QFS system is being phased in.
The words, "from the frying pan into the fire" apply.
The QFS can be used to target political opponents, commercial competitors, or anyone who speaks up against abuses of power, illegal monopolies, and other evils that have been historically promoted by the British Crown and its business partners in Rome.
Along with the QFS arbitrarily scooping up everyone's bank accounts, a process that began in 2023 when all private and national bank accounts and credit union accounts were secretively converted into "Fed Now" accounts, and those are now being mirrored as QFS accounts, there will be some minor efforts toward restitution.
All the patently phony mortgages and "loans" will be cancelled. That's nice. It does nothing to recoup all that has been illegally and unlawfully collected since the 1930's, but it's good to put a stop to it.
It does nothing to return all the homes and farms stolen under false pretenses over the past almost-hundred years. It doesn't help the families that were destroyed, repay those who were rendered homeless, or return these stolen assets to the rightful owners. It doesn't make up for the trauma and losses of millions of people who were unjustly accused of "tax fraud" and "tax evasion" and who endured slander and jail time.
This prospect slaps the banks in a retrospective, "Oops! Yeah-that-happened" way, but they were already bankrupt anyway. They, their Boards of Governors, their Trustees, and their Shareholders all, apparently, get away Scot free for decades of bank fraud resulting in trillions of dollars of losses to the American people, millions of false commercial lien processes, criminal collection procedures, and hundreds of billions of dollars wasted on keeping tax records, compiling, auditing, and accounting for tax filings, agonizing over "allowable deductions" and all the other expenses inherent in the Internal Revenue Service terror, including the cost of keeping people in Federal penitentiaries who never owed these taxes in the first place.
Any inconvenience to the bankers is, reportedly, being made up with lavish donations from the Santiago Family Trust and the St. Germain Trust, that is, of course, if Donald Trump and Company can keep their fingers out of some other conflict for more than three months.
Additional Notice to the World Bank:
As the only known relative of St. Germain, and only known presumed donor-beneficiary, I personally object to the use of any funding from the St. Germain Trust, which has been illegally commandeered into the public sector of the British Territorial U.S. and converted into a foreign statutory trust under False Pretenses. Those funds are meant for deployment in times of peace and whatever we have now is not peace. I have not signed any releases on the funds and any signatures alleged to be mine are counterfeit.
The announcement of the QFS also promises an increase in Social Security payments, a reduction in government size, release of suppressed beneficial patents, and a return to "Constitutional" law.
All of this will be cheered, conveniently, just in time for the Midterm elections.
The last claim, the return of "Constitutional Law", seems to imply a return to Land Law --- but not necessarily. Technically, there is nothing in any of the three (3) Federal Constitutions forbidding administrative law, commercial law, martial law, admiralty law or any other kind of law -- that is, they are all "constitutional" within their jurisdictional venues.
What we, Americans, mean by Constitutional Law is Land Law -- the form of law that frames the Constitutions themselves, and which is used to enforce them.
The stated position of the Federal Subcontractors is that they have no "Common Law" available to them (Thompkins v Erie Railroad), which is true when their courts are all functioning in specific niche venues and the Article III courts vouchsafed to the American Federal Republic are unavailable.
We arrive at a dilemma.
At the current time, the American Federal Republic has been functionally inoperable since 1861, and all its functions have reverted by Operation of Law to the Delegator(s) of their enumerated powers and duties -- the States of the Union and their State Citizens, known as the People of this country.
The only way that "Article III Courts" or rather, new courts operated by the Federation of States in the international Land Law venue can be instituted, is if we bring the States of the Union together and fund and staff them as Federal Courts under direct Federation authority.
We are prepared to do that, but cannot in the short term hope to rebuild the membership of the original Confederation operated as the "States of America" which would be heir to The Constitution for the united States of America.
That is, the Federation can reroute and undertake the duties of the Confederation and reassume performance of those duties which it held from 1776 to 1781, but a finished reconstruction of the American Confederation doing business as the States of America, is a bridge too far at the current time.
Complete reconstruction will require the reacquisition of assets held in state-of-state trusts, creation of new American state-of-state organizations, for example, The State of Maine, new and/or updated State of State Constitutions, their organization and seating as members of a restored Confederation, and then the reconstruction of the American Federal Republic operated by the Confederation.
This will be a lengthy process and would unreasonably delay access to the American Common Law and International Land Law Courts originally provided for as Article III Courts.
The use of the Federation of States in its original capacity as a work-around during such Reconstruction is the only lawful and legal means to provide Land Law Courts ("Article III Courts") in the Interim between now and completion of full Reconstruction.
Mr. Trump has pursued a British Substitution Scheme by which his British Crown Corporation franchise would "assume" the duties of the inoperable American Federal Republic and act as a Successor to Contract under The Constitution for the united States of America.
This "offer" to substitute a British Commercial Corporation for an American Federal Republic is patently unacceptable to us.
Our Constitutional Framework was devised to create a multi-level power-sharing infrastructure that implements an array of treaties underlying that framework. If the treaties are violated or trespassed upon, the constitutional framework arising from the treaties is violated, and vice versa.
The British service contract is limited to the underlying Naval Treaties and has never allowed any role whatsoever for any British entity related to our land jurisdiction functions.
We did not accept any role for Britain in the administration of our land jurisdiction functions in 1787 and we do not accept any such role for British interests now. They need to stand down, respect our treaties, competently and honestly perform those sea jurisdiction functions allotted to them, and stop imposing upon their employers.
Britain's fanciful interpretation of the circumstance following the so-called American Civil War, that our American Government mysteriously vanished and was presumed lost at sea, has proven to be self-serving; we have arrived "home" --not that we ever left-- and are attending to our own business, which includes, but is not limited to, administration of our land and soil jurisdictions.
This information is being forwarded to the U.S. Supreme Court as well as numerous departments, agencies, jurists, and responsible officials worldwide.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
September 17th 2026
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Copyright and republication notice
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the authors, and a link back to this website at http://www.annavonreitz.com, or post the title of the article and a snippet with a link to the article on our website. This copyright is held by Anna Von Reitz, and Paul Stramer jointly. ©2015-2026 All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©