Committee preview · proposals for reviewReview guide

Granna Bytes: She Was Right

← All Anna’s articles

By Anna von Reitz ·

Anna’s original wording is retained below. Any published TASA overview is presented separately.

Reading overview

TASA summary of Anna’s article

Anna reflects on how prejudice can delay recognition of women’s observations and research. Drawing a comparison with fossil collector Mary Anning, she describes the work she and her husband undertook in history, religion and law, and wonders whether a more outspoken male public presence would have helped their ideas gain attention sooner. Her central conclusion is that an argument should be considered on its substance, rather than the age, sex, wealth or public standing of the person presenting it. She encourages readers to listen openly and avoid repeating the assumptions that have silenced people in the past.

Key points

  • Anna draws a parallel between Mary Anning’s experience and the reception of her own work.
  • She questions how gender, personality and public standing influence whose ideas receive attention.
  • Her central message is to consider the substance of a claim rather than judge its messenger.

Prepared by TASA from the research, conclusions and reflections Anna presents in her article. Her original wording follows below.

Read Anna’s original article ↓

Anna’s original article

 By Anna Von Reitz

Women have suffered unjustly for many generations for simply seeing what is in front of our noses.  Mary Anning saw dinosaurs. I, and my husband, saw history, religion, and law. 


I have often wondered how differently and how much faster our discoveries would have gained the traction they always deserved, if Jim had been an outspoken personality, instead of someone suffering from Emerson's Disease.  

Don't let the stupidity and prejudices of the past continue. 

Whether it's a Great-Grandmother on a farm, or a billionaire in a Tesla, hear the truth.  It's the truth that matters, not who the messenger may be. 

Granna